PDA

View Full Version : Stephen Hawking couldn't read until age 8



jodiemiller
22-10-2010, 08:47 AM
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/stephen-hawking-couldnt-read-until-8/story-e6frfku0-1225941939853

Just a little support for our late readers. :)



BRITAIN'S most eminent scientist Stephen Hawking said that he did not learn to read until he was eight years old and was academically idle until he was diagnosed with a form of motor neuron disease.

Hawking, who gave a rare public lecture yesterday at the Royal Albert Hall in London, said, "My sister Philippa could read by the age of four ... but then, she was definitely brighter than me."
He added that he was never more than about halfway up the class at school.
"My classwork was very untidy, and my handwriting was the despair of my teachers," he said.
"But my classmates gave me the nickname Einstein, so presumably they saw signs of something better."
Learning he was facing the possibility of an early death was the catalyst for his most prolific period as a scientist, which led to his discoveries on the big bang and black holes.
"When you are faced with the possibility of an early death, it makes you realize that life is worth living, and that there are lots of things you want to do," he said.
Although he gained a first-class degree at Oxford University, he said that he scraped that result and worked for an average of only an hour a day during his time there.
"You were supposed to be brilliant without effort or to accept your limitations and get a fourth-class degree. I’m not proud of this lack of work. I’m just describing my attitude at the time, which I shared with most of my fellow students: an attitude of complete boredom and feeling that nothing was worth making an effort for," he said.
However, being told at the age of 21 that he would not live for more than a few years galvanised him into intense productivity.

Pinky
22-10-2010, 09:32 AM
and einstein couldn't speak until he was 4. supposedly.

Harmony
22-10-2010, 11:48 AM
Good on him :) I'll be quoting that when anyone is worried about their child's inability to read and also talking about motivation. Internal motivation is just the best :)

mummabare
22-10-2010, 12:19 PM
awesome - I'll tell DJ this :)

Pinky
22-10-2010, 12:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmTxr7OsPj0

Ethereal
22-10-2010, 01:07 PM
Like the link Pinky :D.

Thanks Jodie, I like this topic :).

Hailstorm
22-10-2010, 02:00 PM
Didn't Einstein's teacher tell him he was dumb and would never amount to anything?

It's amazing to see that people we all look up too are just...well, PEOPLE, and have failed before

Pinky
22-10-2010, 02:10 PM
Like the link Pinky :D.

I know eh? who knew.

Kali
22-10-2010, 04:11 PM
There is a lot of research that supports the premise that children are not ready to read until the age of 6. It is a very big joke that the Australian government is forcing, yes I said forcing, teachers to teach prep (aged 4 and 5) children to read.

Phoenix
23-10-2010, 10:34 AM
Are they teaching them, or giving the fundamentals? I have no idea as I haven't spent time in the classroom, just a question.

jodiemiller
25-10-2010, 11:59 AM
They are suggesting changing the prep curriculum from the current play-based curriculum to a more structured pre-literacy, pre-numeracy curriculum, particularly a lot more reading to, since it seems a high proportion of kids are starting school having hardly been read to (television, drug of a nation). The change seems very controversial at the moment. I don't think it will mean they force kids to learn reading and writing earlier than they currently do. I think it is designed to give kids a broader exposure to pre-lit/numeracy concepts, and to give the early learners an earlier opportunity to begin (even though no evidence shows benefits by grade 3 and 4). Suppose that makes Prep/1/2 the literacy focus in all schools. I think it would be sad to lose the Qld play-based curriculum, but you only have to look at what all the child care centres are doing to see that the trend is wide-spread and perhaps it's too late to stop the train.

Personally, I reckon it will make no difference at all but only time will tell.

Kali
25-10-2010, 12:13 PM
It is not a suggestion anymore Jodie, it is a reality. Our school is trialling the new prep curriculum next year. Basically, the first term of year one literacy will be taught in prep. Our school is trying to keep it play based but I don't think all schools will do this.
I can't find a teacher or administrator that is happy about this.

jodiemiller
26-10-2010, 10:09 AM
Yuck! M will be in prep next year and the Principal has assured me it will still be the same curriculum. She's ready for reading, but I'm so glad to have just one more year of non-academic school for her.

Kali
26-10-2010, 11:52 AM
If your school is not a trial school then it will be the old curriculum. I think the new one comes in 2012. Our school is trialling it so DD will be part of that. I hate being the guinea pig, but out of my three kids, she is the one who will cope with it.
I am terribly upset about it all with Ash. The play based curriculum would have really helped him along with his schooling. I am pretty shitty about it because I know all the research against early literacy so I don't see why he should have to endure it.

jodiemiller
26-10-2010, 06:38 PM
Nth Pine Independent for Ash? Dunno - he'd probably be on a flex curriculum anyhow.

Kali
26-10-2010, 08:50 PM
The school we are at will be wonderful for him. The whole family will be at the school together, with DH and I both working there. The SEU is the best in the district. We will find a way to overcome the new prep curriculum. It is just a bit frustrating that we need to when it goes against educations theory and research.